Is there only 1 definition of evidence or does the word 'evidence' mean different things to different people? - definition of a brizilian wax job
Someone has just that I have a different definition of evidence that religious people, but how can this be true, as it can have different definitions of evidence? I see how many people the different levels of testing and atheists, scientists and courts demand a higher level, as evidence can have religious people, but ultimately this is not the definition of proof? Religious people just believe and then find the evidence, and it is a very poor way to verify the truthfulness, but it means they have a different definition of evidence I not?
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Definition Of A Brizilian Wax Job Is There Only 1 Definition Of Evidence Or Does The Word ‘evidence’ Mean Different Things To Different People?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
There are more than one ...
The science and the results of tests of logic in a clear victory for atheists.
As for the spiritual test .... sees the world, no one has ever won?
There are simply too many variables that could as "evidence" are in most cases.
Religious people obviously atheists deny what is painful for them. Since not accept that there is a truth from the beginning, they feel no pressure to honor.
Religious people obviously atheists deny what is painful for them. Since not accept that there is a truth from the beginning, they feel no pressure to honor.
What we all see how real is how our brains in our approach for implementing the project images. If you work hard you can someone who is a red apple green to convince, they will see it that way and his vision to defend actively against all other opinions.
She recalls the time Lionel Hutz threw his case before the court for lack of evidence. "But your honor," said Lionel, rumors are clues in the types of evidence, is not it? "
can and see what the researchers call the theory of the definition of the fact without proof, so I think it is likely to change the words to respond to itself and its own agenda as well and saw evidence that for me!
For a Christian is proof of "faith. How sad.
I rest my case.
No, I can not prove,
Science creates its own evidence and contradicts everything they say
However, calling the test
everything should be based on evidence should not be proved wrong.
Dinosaurs developed test in birds
Tyrannosaurus rex dinosaur protein test have evolved into birds
... http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/en
Prehistoric dinosaurs became birds? Unlikely, says study
http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_a ...
The implication, say the researchers, is almost certain that birds descended from theropod dinosaurs such as Tyrannosaurus rex or Allosaurus. The results in a growing number of evidence in the last two decades by some common views about the development of the animal challenge.
Proof is correct?
Did they or did not
Discovery backs theory of life began in the depths of the ocean
http://www.nowpublic.com/discovery_backs ...
Discove this also applies to otherRS also
The first animals evolved in lakes, seas not to Study Tips
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/ ...
the so-called facts are pure speculation
Age of the earth was speculation without evidence
http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.htm ...
Until now, scientists have not found a way to identify the exact age of the Earth directly from Earth rocks because the oldest rocks on Earth have been exploited and destroyed by plate tectonic processes. If one of the primitive earth, celestial bodies left in their original condition, which have not yet been found. However, scientists were able to determine the probable age of the solar system, and an age for the earth to be calculated, assuming that the Earth and other solid bodies in the solar system was formed at the same time and therefore the same age.
It is assumed, as done for lack of evidence.
as in the judiciary theres different kinds of tests ...
as in the judiciary theres different kinds of tests ...
They apply only to so-called empirical data do not extend to the entire category of evidence. Two mathematical principle (an estimate of the statistical probability of a single cell origin of the natural processes and not only 4.6 billion years) in the history of the universe. It was 10, the 40,000-feed! 10 50. to is something totally impossible!
Estimation of the natural processes
Thank you for allowing me to exist. I have long waited for, appeared to mix chemicals for my highly developed common ancestor for life on Earth, possibly foreign sown (no Science Lab has seen what has happened) the primordial oceans. Cockroaches also have the same ancestors. Thank you, I have the same value of a cockroach. Thank you it does not matter if I'm in a trash can, because they really no value for the beginning or the end, despite my change in my class that has lasted a very long time, billions of years. I praise no matter whether you everything that exists in the set U destroyedNivers followed by himself. Hallelujah!
To pray in the name of evolution, Amen
The evidence must take care not testable, repeatable and verifiable - religious people on all these things - who think that the experience is demonstrated. This makes their false definitions. This is not Alice in Wonderland. It Humpty Dumpty.
There is a strong suspicion that he is wrong because put question marks on the Internet. If you do not trust you, damned if we want.
And of course there are different definitions of the test. In the insurance law. (Bad choice on your part, but there are also question marks).
As you can see, the evidence is otherwise what you are looking for. First, you must have a question, do you have evidence.
Test (n.)
In 1300, this aspect of the conclusions can be drawn "by Fr. evidence test evidentia LL", originally distinguished "from L. Price (see Clear). It means" reason to believe "is the end of 14c., by the evidence "is 1660th C. 1500 legal sense of the word, when he began to chase the witnesses.
But * not * have a different definition of evidence that people are religious.
Sincerely, (and me) is something like this:
"This seems to prove or disprove something"
You may like this:
"I say it is"
Peace.
Post a Comment